Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit kymlee's column >>

KYMLEE

Home Page
My transformation is not yet complete
Articles Posted: 83  Links Seeded: 745
Member Since: 9/2006  Last Seen: 5/10/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Miley Cyrus Vanity Fair Photos: A PR Nightmare

Fri May 2, 2008 10:40 PM EDT
entertainment, controversy, miley-cyrus, vanity-fair, annie-leibovitz
By kymlee

The now infamous photo...

Advertise | AdChoices

Disney likes their child stars wholesome, a stipulation that contrast sharply with the day's era of bad boy and girl celebutants. Miley Cyrus' preemptive apology for the image presented by her recent Vanity Fair photo shoot with Annie Leibovitz is a perfect example of the challenges facing young stars these days.

The truth is that this controversy with Miley Cyrus has not taught us things anything we don't already know. There is no denying that while the photos may be very tasteful, the main issue is really about the conflicting ideals between making young girls sex idols while simultaneously trying to force them to maintain a wholesome image. Disney, Cyrus and her family want the young starlet to remain a good role model for young viewers but she is constantly being pushed into more and more adult atmospheres and situations.

If Cyrus were older, the photos taken by Leibovitz may not be an issue, but the fact is that the pictures were quite grown-up for a 15-year-old. Granted, at some point the world will have to accept that Miley Cyrus is growing up and as she does so, she should be allowed to be presented as a young woman as opposed to a little girl. Truthfully, I doubt these images would be such a big deal if it were not for Cyrus' age because they are not obscene; simply not age appropriate.

In a statement to CNN, a spokesperson for Vanity Fair noted that Cyrus was accompanied by parents and/or guardians during the entire shoot during which they were able to see all of the photos. They even quoted Cyrus saying that she felt the pictures were "artisy" and didn't see anything wrong with them at all.

Of course this does not mean that as she makes the transition from a girl into womanhood that Cyrus' image must become less respectable. However, in this time of over-sexualized teen and tween idols, the line delineating what is age appropriate is increasingly blurred. According to one Hollywood gossip blog, Miley Cyrus has been shirking her wholesome image in other ways as well with pictures of herself suggestively showing off her bra and Gawker actually accused Vanity Fair and Annie Leibovitz of grooming Cyrus like pedophiles. I think that's taking it a bit far.

Be that as it may, it is entirely possible that Cyrus was simply caught up in the glitz and glam of everyone telling her she was beautiful and that the photos were great. As pointed out by Elisabeth Hasselbeck on "The View," hindsight is 20/20 and maybe Miley Cyrus and her family indeed thought the pictures were ok while on set, but changed their mind after thinking it over further. How many of us can honestly say we have not had moments like that?

At this point the best thing for Miley Cyrus and her PR team to do is continue doing damage control. Since the media has latched on to the story spinning it this way and that, it is up to Cyrus to defend her image, and making a public apology is always a good start.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • kymlee's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Entertainment Gateway, Newsviners' Picks, Open Mic
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (37)
  • Open Mic (0)
kymlee

I honestly don't think there is anything wrong with the picture, she's covered enough. As noted here Miley Cyrus presented a far more vampy image in other public appearances where her face was caked with make-up and she had on stiletto heels. I mean...she's not even nude in the picture.

C'mon prudes, get over yourselves.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Fri May 2, 2008 10:45 PM EDT
Gwenny

OMG, she's so thin. There is nothing sexy about that picture. She looks like a little girl waiting for her mom to get her clothes after her bath. GODS sometimes I'm ashamed of America.

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Sat May 3, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
kymlee

OMG, she's so thin.

Yeah, when I saw the picture, the only think I thought was wrong was being able to see her ribs through her back. That can't be healthy.

  • 3 votes
#1.2 - Sat May 3, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
Gwenny

Well, her posture sucks as well. But I'm with you, there's nothing sexy here unless you are a pedophile. That is not a woman, that is a child.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Sat May 3, 2008 1:54 PM EDT
Scott (Scoop) Butki

Great piece, Kymlee. Clipped to Newsviner's Picks.

  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Fri May 9, 2008 9:40 AM EDT
kymlee

Thanks Scott!

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Fri May 9, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
Reply
Jared Kardos

Yeah, this "scandal" is just really ridicculious. Seriously, "a skinny-ass fifteen year-old's BARE BACK! OMG WTF BBQ!!1!!111"

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Sat May 3, 2008 2:31 AM EDT
Roy Batty

She has had more "exposure" this week than the last year. Maybe all by design?

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Sat May 3, 2008 2:43 AM EDT
Jared Kardos

Hell, before this I barely even knew of her or Hanna Montana. It's amazing, because now I have finally found something that makes the old saying "ignorence is bliss" true to me.

But you know who I really think planned it? Disney. They know their stars only become REALLY fameous when they start going for the "sex-kitten" approach, and they're having Vanity Fair start it so that they can say how bad it is while rubbing their hands in glee behind closed doors at all the new exposure to their @!$%#ty show.

Of course, I could have put tin-foil inside my fedora again, but hell, that's what I'd do if I were in Disney's shoes.

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Sat May 3, 2008 2:57 AM EDT
kymlee

She has had more "exposure" this week than the last year. Maybe all by design?

I was thinking the same thing. There's no such thing as bad press.

  • 3 votes
#3.2 - Sat May 3, 2008 1:50 PM EDT
FDBryant3

She has had more "exposure" this week than the last year. Maybe all by design?

Considering that she has been the #1 selling concert act over the past year with a number of attendant stories behind that, I doubt it.

My personal opinion of it is that it was a case of "it seemed like a good idea at the time". I think she (and her parents/handlers) got caught up in the excitement of a chance to appear on Vanity Fair that they didn't think it through. My guess is that they thought they would be able to do this without effecting their core audience since that audience doesn't look at Vanity Fair. I don't think they counted on the media picking up on it and plastering all over the place. They should have, but in the heat of things I think it was overlooked. Now that it has blown up, I do think they are genuinely chagrined about it and wondering "what were we thinking" (although I have to wonder where was Disney in all this - they are notorious for controlling their stars images and I would think a bit sensitive considering the recent High School Musical faux pas).

As for the picture itself, I'm kinda borderline about it. First I'll state I don't really like it based on aesthetics. While not exactly being over the line it is probably a bit to suggestive for a 15 year old Being 15 is an issue. As a society we have set a line where it is okay to consider a young woman sexually and when it is not. Agree or disagree with that line it is what we have agreed upon. The other is that it is Miley Cyrus. Someone of lesser fame might not generate quite the controversy with explanations of capturing a girl becoming a young woman. It is Miley Cyrus though and she is riding a wave based on an image she created that goes counter to this. Does that mean she shouldn't grow up? Of course not - she is going to. However this would have been better received I think if she had allowed Hannah Montana to play out then "disappeared" for a year or then came out with this pic when she was 19 or 20 using it as an announcement to moving her career to more adult roles.

Overall though I think this will blow over with little effect on her career if she is sincere about her apology and truly returns to the Hannah Montana image for another year or two. She'll be able to transition to whatever she wants and go as far as her talent will take her. If though she follows the Britanny Spears route with a number self destructive missteps she'll end up another dismissed sexualize caricature that is pitied more than anything else.

  • 4 votes
#3.3 - Sat May 3, 2008 4:38 PM EDT
Reply
xpectmoreDeleted
dale102

Wasn't she just talking months ago about loving Jesus, and how she wants to be a light to young girls...

  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Sun May 4, 2008 9:35 AM EDT
kymlee

Yes, and? I don't think that being spiritual and/or Christian doesn't mean that she is going to be perfect and won't make her fair share of mistakes. The fact that she is a public figure does not eliminate the fact that she is human, and just like so many of us, she is flawed. So far I see no reason to think that Miley Cyrus is any less a role model. She apologized for what she admitted was bad judgment; that's a lot more than I can say for some other celebrities who don't take their (reluctant) public responsibility seriously enough.

  • 5 votes
#5.1 - Sun May 4, 2008 1:04 PM EDT
Reply
Anna-277133

While I do not believe the photos are completely age appropriate for a girl her age. The photo is a striking comment on young girls today. If we are going to seriously consider the idea of over glamorizing, and the overt sexuality of television, and media portrayal of young teens today, then shouldn't we also consider the clothing that is put out? the fashion magazines, and catalogue that push for the sexy image in girls, not women, girls! A few years ago retailers were putting out clothing that was more in line for cheap hookers as opposed to young children. It isn't until parents, and the culture as a whole start telling these designers that is not appropriate and we are not going to buy it, that they are going to understand.

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Tue May 6, 2008 12:50 PM EDT
kymlee

A few years ago retailers were putting out clothing that was more in line for cheap hookers as opposed to young children. It isn't until parents, and the culture as a whole start telling these designers that is not appropriate

Absolutely right. Itty bitty skirts and mid-drift baring halters...I've been noticing the clothing for little strippers too. Micro minis for 7-year-olds, that's a bit much. The sad thing is that people don't even think past the fact that the clothes are the latest fashion and parents don't seem to raise their kids anymore. Instead their content to let them raise themselves.

  • 2 votes
#6.1 - Tue May 6, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
Roy Batty

I agree ... this photo treatment is no where near appropriate for her age.

  • 3 votes
#6.2 - Tue May 6, 2008 6:33 PM EDT
Reply
NCOPINE

I haven't noticed anyone commenting on the pic of Miley lying down next to her father with a sultry expression on her face.It truly seemed creepy to me.I'm sure it wasn't meant to be suggestive of a diva w/ an older man,but...not a good idea:(

    Reply#7 - Tue May 6, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
    leigh-277151

    I wish the media would bear in mind Miley is a TEENAGER! Teenagers are notorius for not making great decisions and thinking about things in regard to the short term...I know, I was one. If someone has a problem with these photos why are they not holding the adults responsible, ie: photographer, VF Reps, Parents, Agents... As adults its our responsibility to guide children to making the right decisions and teaching them to make decisions that they will be comfortable with long term. Like it or not Miss Cyrus is still a child, be it a talented well composed child...she is still a child.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#8 - Tue May 6, 2008 1:35 PM EDT
    FDBryant3

    Honestly, I think when the media talks about her and the decision to do this I think they are speaking about Miley Cyrus the brand and not the person. In this discussion I've referred to her several times where who I'm really directing the comments at is everyone involved.

    • 3 votes
    #8.1 - Tue May 6, 2008 6:46 PM EDT
    Reply
    Whatever-277166

    Get on with it. Miley is beautiful. The photo is beautiful. It is just a photo and I wouldn't get squeamish about my own daughter (if I had one) having the same photo taken. This is completely blown out of proportion. Let's leave it as it was meant to be. A beautiful young lady (15 or not) in a photograph. Not naked!!!!!!!!

    • 1 vote
    Reply#9 - Tue May 6, 2008 2:09 PM EDT
    NY2VAGIRL

    This is such a crazy, pointless argument! How can people freak out about the VF photos (which, actually, are quite tasteful & lovely) when this child appears regularly in jeans cut so low that you can see her pubic bones and tops so tight she looks like a sage sausage? She struts around on the concert stage - lipsynching, no less - while gyrating and growling words to some otherworldly tune or the other. If this is the "wholesome" image that Disney, et al, want to convey...umm...they're failing miserably.

      Reply#10 - Tue May 6, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
      Renee-277226

      The author of this article should have used spell check. There were some grammar errors as well as typos. The correct spell of Disney – the incorrect spelling Desney . .

      • 1 vote
      Reply#11 - Tue May 6, 2008 4:39 PM EDT
      Jared Kardos

      Tip: It's a lot more kosher to tell people about typos by going to their page, clicking on "contact author" and telling them privately rather than publically.

      • 3 votes
      #11.1 - Tue May 6, 2008 5:14 PM EDT
      kymlee

      It's ok Jared, I don't mind. I'm glad someone pointed that out...that's kind of embarrassing. Thanks Renee, you saw first hand the difficulty with citizen journalism: no editors. ;)

      If you or anyone else sees any other errors that need correcting please contact me.

      • 1 vote
      #11.2 - Tue May 6, 2008 6:17 PM EDT
      Reply
      c j locke

      what the heck were her parents thinking? Personally I think that jealousy may have played a factor consciously or unconsciously in her parents decision to allow her to do this. And don't tell me it was her agents.The girl is still a minor and her parents are still responsible for her

      • 1 vote
      Reply#12 - Tue May 6, 2008 6:19 PM EDT
      kymlee

      I would rather not take an approach quite that cynical cjlocke. How horrible would that be for her parents to purposefully tank her career with poor judgment. For now I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt and saying that this was a legitimate mistake on their parts.

      • 2 votes
      #12.1 - Tue May 6, 2008 6:44 PM EDT
      Reply
      Dlnw

      While the pictures were a bit suggestive for a 15 year old at least she is not a pregnant Disney star like Jamie Lyn Spears. Why is the media acting like it is ok to be unwed and pregnant which to me is worse than posing for some pictures that may be suggestive. Miley Cyrys continues to be a good role model and the media should leave her alone . It is hard enough to grow up in that business without every move being scrutinized.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#13 - Wed May 7, 2008 9:30 AM EDT
      FDBryant3

      The difference between Nickelodeon (Jamie Lyn Spears) and Disney (Miley Cyrus) perhaps. For better or for worse Miley is a much more major star known for being Hannah Montanna than Jamie is for being Zoey. In the end Miley generates discussion and sales/ratings and Jamie doesn't.

      • 3 votes
      #13.1 - Wed May 7, 2008 2:25 PM EDT
      Reply
      vacelts

      Kymlee, nice written article.

      I think that part of the controversy has more to do with the age of Miley's fans than her own age. Her fans start at 5 and 6. I think other 15 years olds can deal with the photo, it's the image being portrayed to her younger fans that is upsetting parents, imo.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#14 - Wed May 7, 2008 3:12 PM EDT
      kymlee

      Thanks, that's a great point vacelts (can I call you V?). I personally think the parents should stop being so sensitive. Eventually Miley is going to grow up. If her fans continue to be between the ages of 6-15 is it really fair for them to expect her to maintain the same image? Of course it would never be necessary to go to any extreme as far as her image is concerned and I understand the idea of her being a role model by virtue of her fame, but I really do think people need to get over themselves.

      • 3 votes
      #14.1 - Wed May 7, 2008 6:55 PM EDT
      vacelts

      can I call you V?

      Sure.

      If her fans continue to be between the ages of 6-15 is it really fair for them to expect her to maintain the same image?

      No. And I think you'll start to see a change in her fan base as a result.

      • 4 votes
      #14.2 - Thu May 8, 2008 8:48 AM EDT
      Reply
      DWubee

      It's up to us as parents to allows monitor what are kids are seeing. Miley does have a responsibility as a role model, but she is growing up as well.

      http://www.going2theshow.com

        Reply#15 - Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:37 PM EST
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse |
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com