
"Do I make you horny, baby?" [image source]
This is a Newsvine Music: Listen In feature.
When MTV was launched 27 years ago, its purpose was to play music videos. This noble concept gave way to a pop culture phenomenon, forever changing the dynamic of celebrity culture. MTV became the place to spot the next big thing, and played a huge role in the break-out careers of artists like Madonna and Michael Jackson as well as ushering hip hop into the mainstream with Y! MTV Raps.
Over the years, MTV has become less music television, opting instead for programming dominated by reality television shows. For those of us who remember the MTV of the 80s and 90s, and remember MTV being the go-to source for music news, videos, events and breaking new artists, we see what it has become and wonder what happened.
Many credit MTV's present incarnation to the current music landscape and the change in how music is being consumed. The proliferation of the Internet and digital media has democratized media in ways that few expected, putting more control in the hands of the consumers and forcing the various media industries to reconsider they way they do business. Where previously MTV - for better or worse - was the arbiter of cool, the network began to experience sagging ratings and made changes in the programming, supposedly to fend of becoming irrelevant. According to Business Week, MTV visionary and CEO Judy McGrath and "her coterie of aging hipster executives" took a blow to the ego when Rupert Murdock bought MySpace. McGrath considered the acquisition a red flag and missed opportunity; it was time for a change.
Although this change may have benefited MTV by paying off in ratings and ensuring that they successfully mesmerize their target 13-20 year old audience, it alienated many of its previous following. As the network scrambled to update their programming in and effort to remain "cool," it found the cheapest and easiest answer, often catering to the lowest common denominator. While some would argue that MTV is giving its viewers what they want, I would argue that as a long standing trend setter, MTV holds much more influence than some would give it credit for. Instead of looking at the current boom of indie rock music, seeking out some of today's best unknown talents and helping them break out, MTV has chosen to move further away from it original mission of being music television. Where it was originally groundbreaking and experimental, MTV is now emblematic of everything wrong with pop culture today and an example of conglomerate media establishment.
So this Sunday MTV is airing its 17th annual Movie Awards, a show promised to be "packed with hours of unprecedented insanity." While some may consider it the most relevant movie awards show in the US, I say it was one of many steps MTV made towards its current programming and a glaring example of a loss of focus. Actually, the Movie Awards garners massive ratings and continues to be a success, despite the declining ratings of the Video Music Awards (VMA)...that is until last year. But even on a good day, the VMAs received less than half the viewers of the Movie Awards. Is this an indication of MTV's relevance in the music world; or rather the lack thereof?
While still a highly successful network and self envisioned barometer for all things "cool," MTV has moved so far from its niche that much like any other brand that loses focus, its product is quick, cheap and easy. No longer an innovator and hub for music news, videos, interviews and such, MTV as many remember it is a distant memory and stands today a virtual mirror for today's pop-culture of celebreality obsession, materialism and obnoxious, self centered youth.
Is anyone else wondering, what's the big deal?
Read moreWhat's the Big Deal features from Listen In.
Read more music news, reviews and opinions from Kymlee.
Cross-posted to Listen In Music.
© Kimberlee Morrison 2008 for Listen In. Some rights reserved.
is MTV still on?
wow
it jumped the shark so long ago.....
Hmm MTV might be the first example of network drift.
I'm pretty sure I picked the term up elsewhere in discussions about changes to History, A&E, and the Sci-fi channel among others. It just occurred me that MTV was probably the first channel we've seen go through it. Which would make sense I guess since it is one of the first if not the first niche networks out there.
I fear it means that niche networks just do not work. On the other with advent of IPTV it may not matter as programming will be delivered directly on request.
It would have been nice to see it show the indie groups a little more love... that way the mainstream wouldn't necessarily have to be a bastion of bull@!$%#.
Actually, when it first debuted, MTV2 was quite an alternative to the already mainstream-pandering styles of the original MTV. Fistly, it was commercial-free! Secondly, shows like Advance Warning, Remote Control, and any program that Matt Pinfield could get himself on were good resources for people who might like to hear (or see, in a music video) something they never had before. Shoot, I mean, I found out about the Gorillaz by watching MTV2 at 1am - and I was hooked!
Of cousre, MTV2 has gone the way of MTV (how could it not?), and is now essentially where you go to see all the episodes of Shot at Love, Sweet 16, or any other MTV program you may have missed, as they play mostly recycled programming.
I agree, MTV2 was really good when it launched, but sadly has gone the way of MTV. I'm pretty sure I haven't watched MTV for more than a 5 minute stretch since the days of Amp.
I think I've got you beat by a couple years. When I was watching MTV, 120 Minutes and Liquid Television were both still on.
(Liquid Television, of course, wasn't a music show, but it was still "cool".)
*Sigh*
kids like novel stimuli...and desperately love hipness similarly still require a authoritative source for sound decision making, hence mtv does work well with the "under age" groups but instead of having to search find niche markets they took a more disney-esque approach to artist development at least for their mainstream programming...end result, crap that most reasonable people cannot tolerate...unfortunately what i think is adrift in this instance are the now adults that grew up endlessly watching mtv, as as single channel, and thinking that they were getting into some hip new cutting edge material, well okay 120 minutes with the snarky hat wearing brit, and yo! mtv raps as well, but in the end it was still t-n-a all they way. but will they ever play the ass and titties song, probably not but yet. its funny, nearly naked girl in the metal video has a black bikini on and a snake, girl in the rap video has a neon orange bikini on and is writhing on a rented boat, girl in r&b video is in some near naked yet heartbroken state on a bed, all in white of course... nearly naked girl in female r&b video is madonna, tee har...lowest common denominator will win until the next novel act comes along... maybe "circuit" house music will be next? oh wait we already went through that with the boy bands....
This may be a topic better suited for a sociology thesis rather than a blog post. You've bitten off quite a hunk Kim, but I liked the article (as you can see).
Actually, the Movie Awards garners massive ratings and continues to be a success, despite the declining ratings of the Video Music Awards
Go figure. MTV hardly plays even a 15-second clip of music videos any more - at least, hardly here in the states. Though, I imagine that the other global editions of MTV are essentially exporters of American culture more than they are intricately intertwined with their own regional markets, and have also done away with the music video (at least, a cursory browsing of MTV UK, MTV Europe, MTV Asia, MTV Australia, and MTV Japan would indicate as such). It seems almost silly that MTV would host such a rewards show, when networks like FUSE or online sources like YouTube actually play music videos. Does TRL even exist anymore?
While some would argue that MTV is giving its viewers what they want, I would argue that as a long standing trend setter, MTV holds much more influence than some would give it credit for.
It may be giving its viewers what they think they want, or rather, MTV it telling it's viewers what they want, and then delivering. Still, I think MTV acknowledges that there may be people out there like myself or my girlfriend who can't stand much of MTV's programming, but still watch it anyway, sort of like witnessing a train wreck in action - on the odd occasion, I can still find an episode of True Life that I find not only entertaing but touching as well (such as True Life... I'm a Schizophrenic, I'm a Sex Worker, or I Have Anxiety). Also, I think that for those who are my age (25 or so) are targeted less by MTV and more by Viacom's sister network VH1, as it more regularly features programming that at least ties into music and culture (their rockDocs are quite solid, especially when discussing things like the Sexual Revolution or the Drug War).
Still, it's hard to say we didn't see this coming. I mean, once you have an award show, there's bound to be a goody bag, and where there's goody bags, there's money. Also, something that can catch the attention of young people for any length of time is bound to eventually catch the attention of those who will seek a profit from that kind of focus. I mean, when you realy break it down, the causes of the fall from grace of MTV's integrity are myriad, and someone can point to almost any cultural ill in our current day and likely have a point: Children are over-medicated and have no attention span for a 3-and-a-half-minute video on anything, even with music. Increasing intellectual apathy amongst young people leads to increasing vapidity of their media. Corporate buyouts and tie-ins lead to a greater focus on materialism and consumption, and a decreasing focus on product quality. All are probably valid and on point. If MTV has ever been a reflection of the state of youth culture, I think that its current programming content and style are sadly an honest depiction of where we are today.
The proliferation of the Internet and digital media has democratized media in ways that few expected, putting more control in the hands of the consumers and forcing the various media industries to reconsider they way they do business.
This is probably the truest statement. MTV was started by (at least, if you believe it) a bunch of upstart kids who wanted to do something new with media. Today, upstart media youths don't found their own TV networks, they make viral videos, webcomics, blogs, and who knows what next. The truth is that the really cool kids are not on MTV, they're on Newgrounds, YouTube, Blogger, and the internet in general.
I think there are other entertainment technologies that have leaped frogged cable television.
MTV's target audience is "teeny boppers," and they play a huge role in developing youth culture today, which is quite scary when you think about the content they air. Young teeny boppers are becoming brainwashed with the superficial values and representations on MTV's programming. The current epidemic of eating disorders in youngsters could easily be attributed to the unreal looks of the "normal" people on reality shows. How "normal" or average are these reality stars in reality? Not so normal. The cliche phrase "sex sells" fits perfectly here. They promote looks that people like to look at or watch, not that most people can easily attain. This can result in young people acquiring serious complexes that haunt them for extended periods of time or even their whole life.
What happened to the music videos, and why is so much of the public infatuated with the garbage reality shows on MTV? MTV has become a damaging segment of the media that offers basically nothing of true value.
Just like when Rolling Stone ran its controversial ad campaign contrasting its past and its nouveau yuppie present (perception vs. reality), MTV wants little to do with its early adherents. The older set, the Kurt Loder "generation," have been dropped in favor of a younger demographic with different interests.
I haven't watched MTV in ages, but I wasn't there at its inception either. (Cable TV came late to the Bronx.)
Just MTV? Hell, pretty much all the music channels have gone this road--VH1 had turned into the "I Love the Best" channel: nothing but "I love the 80s/90s/70s/Victorian Age" and "B3S+ W33K EV@H!!!!111!@". The only one I can think of that does some music is Fuse, and even that's going by the wayside.
There are still some mostly music channels--MTV Hits and VH1 Classic, mainly. They show some stuff (re-runs of TRL and music documentaries, respectively), but mostly music.
But I don't give a crap about them. Indies from the Internet all the way, baby. :D
Indies from the Internet all the way, baby. :D
Got any recommendations?
I kind of like The Daily Indie on maniaTV, mostly because host Christy is adorable ;)
Indiefeed, mostly--almost-daily podcasts with different channels, with everything from alt. rock, dance, hip hop, and even blues.
God I hope it's Listen In. Do you hear that fellas? There's an unfulfilled niche out there! We should fill it. :D
Good thinking. I'll cash out my Newsvine earnings and buy out MSNBC. At my current rate it should only take me approximately 5000 years =p
Why do you need MSNBC? Just convince Calvin that we need webcasting.
I like the sound of Listen In TV.
Heh, I stopped watching BET long before I stopped watching MTV
Ironically, you can still find a music video or three on BET, albeit mostly ones with jiggly booty.
Ironically, you can still find a music video or three on BET, albeit mostly ones with jiggly booty.
Which isn't too bad, as long as you have a "Mute" button on your remote control.
I heard this from someone who works in television production: He said the reason MTV and other music networks have turned to reality television garbage is because the production costs of making such shows are much much cheaper than music videos, whose costs can run very high, while still attracting the same coveted teeny-bopper demographic.
This is a great article, but I do have one thing to say, I'm not too sure about MTV being responsible for Michael Jackson's celebrity.
That's true, Ryan, about the differeing costs - sort of. If you compared 30 minutes of reality tv production costs vs 30 minutes of music video production, the difference would be almost incomparable. BUT, MTV doesn't pay for the production of any music videos - the music studios do, as a tool to help promote the music they're selling. That's why you don't usually have much trouble finding videos on Youtube and whatnot, because studios make their money off of album sales and concert ticket sales and are happy for the videos to be strewn around the interweb (just not in a form that can be burned to CD!)
Let's not forget the sequence. The label had to demand that MTV run Jackson's videos because MTV was racially segregated at its inception. They discriminated against Black artists and Black music until they realized how big a moneymaker Black art is.
I don't watch reality shows and I hate how MTV has changed.
MTV was great back in the day but now it's just another channel to that bites.
MTV is now emblematic of everything wrong with pop culture today and an example of conglomerate media establishment.
Word.
I agree wholeheartedly, and have been making these observations for years now. I've always been, what I consider to be a fairly cool geezer of 55 now, and have followed MTV since its inception. MTV seems to be doing now, what it did earlier on in capitulating to the hip-hop generation by going completely in one direction, at the expense of its earlier hard core fan base. Wouldn't it be nice if they could at least hold onto SOME of its time honored traditions to appease some of it's fans (that made them what they are today). The whole instant gratification thing with the cheaper than cheap "reality shows" (that are anything but reality), celebrity worship, and generally just crappy programming begins at the top and trickles down. No wonder the kids of today are in the TV watching rut that they're in.
I remember when MTV was the province of hair metal and the first Black performer, to great trepidation and import, was Michael Jackson.
MTV is pretty much worthless, just like every other television station that broadcasts primarily reality television. Stations with so much reality TV offer nothing educational, they are just game shows where most of "reality" is actually acted out, editing makes things seem different than they truly are, and the content is just terrible. Shows like "Rock of Love" or even "The Bachelor" are called Reality, but when is a guy or girl going to have 30 people who want to marry them without ever being in a real relationship.
ABC TV in Australia has been producing a show called rage for 20 years and it's still in pretty much the same format as when it began (no ads, no stupid ditzy compares, just all music).
It airs on Friday and Saturday nights and is a real fixture now. The kind of thing you zombie out to at midnight when you're staying in, or at 6am after a big night out! They often have guest programmers who are musicians/ bands and that can be really fantastic, and they usually have a section of the night dedicated to a theme. ABC is not a cable station (although they now have a digital channel called ABC2) and so when they introduced a music program in the late 80s that ran from about 11 pm to 9am the next morning it was pretty cool! I don't think there was any (??) cable in Australia at that time...
Nice article kymlee, thanks so much! :o)
if they weren't the booty shakin' money hos and clothes, club hopping...(I think you get the point)
sure do, ha, ha, ha!!! And I absolutely agree ;)
Although I get all of my music news on the internet now, I wouldn't mind just watching music videos every once in a while.. I'm pretty sure if there was something worth watching people would watch.
Maybe, but you can't match the instant access that sites like GVideo or YouTube provide. I mean, perhaps with creative, genre-specific, or otherwise unique programming you could grab enough viewers off the internet and back to the television. Yet in the long run, I think a network would lose out to the infinitely more powerful draw that is being able to search for what you like, find it, be offered suggestions based on keywords, and have an online community with which to provide suggestions and interact.
Granted, some, maybe even many, of us would like to just sit and watch some MTV like we used to, and not be bothered with the work it takes to find what you like on a vast video site. And a random offering may just be your next favorite video - but the fact of the matter is that fewer and fewer people watch TV like that, and, more importantly, more and more are becoming familiar enough with the internet to not be scared away by the immensity of it all.
One can only sit in front of the computer for so long...
I'm right there with you on the mourning of the Death of Music Television. I've just come to grips with the idea that it may, and most probably, will never be coming back, especially with the alternatives the internet offers. Solution? Connect the compy with the telly and make a multimedia center!
I remember when MTV played music...back then it was cool.
I remember when VJ Adam Curry quit MTV because he was sick of watching it be dumbed down and having to introduce shows like Beavis and Butthead...Adam Curry became very cool to me that day.
MTV today? Useless data coming down the pipe. Not relevant. Not important. Not interesting.
...video killed the radio star...
Yeah, but video was killed by lousy cartoons, fart jokes, and pointless reality shows.
Sure, the videos were pointless too, but no one every tried to say they weren't. ;-)
Trivia: The first video ever played on MTV was "Video killed the radio star" by the Buggles
killed by lousy cartoons
Don't make me defend MTV animation. I have to say that the cartoons aired on MTV during it's last dying throes as reasonable television were and are still some of my favorites. From Aeon Flux and Cartoon Sushi to the ubiquitous Daria and Downtown, MTV had some mad skilled creativity in the cartoon department.
I too have had this discussion over the years with many and have figured out something. First, I remember one year they had the VMA and they ran a montage of people's comments. Had the execs tuned in they would have picked up on this. In the middle of all the clips was a kid that said "Hey MTV, I've got an idea, why don't you show MUSIC VIDEOS!" The crowd roared and then applauded. This was only 10 or 15 years after it's conception, incidently, that was roughly the age of the kid if I remember correctly. If a teen ager or even 20 something can recognize that why can't MTV. I'm in my 40's now and wouldn't have it in my house if someone paid me because of the direction they took years ago and I know plenty that share the same feeling.
Block programming! Don't run Hip Hop with R&R, the two have never mixed well back to back, visually or in audio. Old formats were never the problem, the video content was to blame. Split the channels MTV R&R, MTV SOUL, MTV CLUB DANCE. Bring back a Friday video party type show. Night Flight and Night Tracks stole many away from MTV cause it was straight up with what it was going to present. MTV ... not so much! It's seems that VIDEO KILLED IT'S OWN VIDEO STAR!
I'm not sure if you are being serious but here is a quick review of the first video on MTV. The Buggles have an important part in pop history
Incidentally, at the coffeehouse I go to twice a week for open mic nite there's a guy that does acoustic covers of older songs and he does good versions of that Bugles song, as well "turning japanese" and a few others.
kymlee
LOL, I'm very familiar with the song, I knew exactly what you were referencing Spooky. :) Scott, I've started going to open mics again recently. There are tons of coffee houses here in Long Beach, all of them with at least one night when there are live performances. It's good to get out and discover something new. My favorite open mic is at a bar near the beach though. The band is awesome! Even if they don't know the song all you have to do is hum the melody and they'll do the rest. There are still a bunch of really good musicians out there.
Exactly. It's excellent.
And lately one of the two special needs guys I work with will sing "Your Cheating Heart" with the m.c. of the shows.
And the other guy.. well I asked him why he never claps and learned that he is too self-conscious and fretted that he would clap at the right time. So I explained that he clap when the music stops and all nite he would get so excited when the song ended and he'd applaud and look at me to make sure he was doing fine and I'd give him the nod of approval and he'd smile.
I miss the old MTV. I've found VH1, once the stodgy adult contemporary music video channel, plays more new artists. I never thought I'd be watching it but it's where I go (late nights and mornings) to see new videos. MTV has moved on to this Tila Tequila and Real World garbage and forgot its music roots.
MTV and pop culture in general became irrelevant to me probably around the time I turned 25. By then I had a real job, was buying my first house, and considered myself an adult for the first time. The lifestyle I saw reflected on MTV was no longer my lifestyle. These days I wouldn't know most of the artists on any current Top 10 list if they walked up and introduced themselves. I guess it's about time to go to Carousel.
Are music videos even relevant anymore? There was once a time when a good video could make a so-so song a hit. If MTV and another music video-oriented outlets no longer highlight videos, why should artists bother making them?
Are music videos even relevant anymore?
Depends on whether you look at them as a part of the commercial music money machine or as pieces of creative expression in their own right. I think they still help to sell music, depending on the particular taste of the viewer/ listener. Some are just good to watch.
Relevance can be subjective.
The last line, "virtual mirror for today's pop-culture of celebreality obsession, materialism and obnoxious, self centered youth." That says it all.
Ever since MTV abandoned the music video programming on which it was built, the "M" has come to stand for Moron.
Being a 50 something male, I remember when MTV first came on line. We had just erected a 10' satellite dish in the back yard. Along with the dish we received coordinates of the first available 9 satellites that broadcast open signals, and locked on. We found Music Videos and a limited sports programming show called ESPN. It was "COOL" to watch these new things called music videos. These videos opened up a new world of music to me, which in turn prompted me to go out and spend my money on these artists. Sure Beavis and Butthead were (at the time) wayyyy out there, but they were uncomfortably funny. For me, being in Seattle, Grunge Rock was becoming the in thing, that was MTV's first step outside of the mainstream (then) music. After Pearl Jam and Nirvana, came Rap, which is where they lost me. I have not watched MTV in what must be 12 years. My 27 year old daughter still watches, but, if we had the choice of which programs we pay for, MTV (or its spin-offs), they would have been culled from my channel list. Is all about the money, and money is (Lack of) Reality TV.
You didn't watch Put 'em on the Glass ? Come on, homey's from Sea-Wa...
Re: rap I think it's definitely music. I like the rap music that encourages positive thinking, be it digible planets or whatever. I leaned more toward bands that were a blend of electronic/industrial and rap, like Consolidated and Mc900 Foot Jesus and Disposable Heroes of Hypocrisy.
I do have a question: What ever happened to Boogie Down Productions (I loved You Must Learn and Edutainment) and Public Enemy? Are they even around or just recycled at this point via greatest hits albums?
Flav was the one part of P.E. (besides the anti-semitism stuff) that I didn't like. But I love good lyrics and chuck d and krs-1 were full of them.
Interestingly enough Criminal Minded from Boogie Down Productions supposedly set the stage for gangsta rap.
Really? I thought he was late to that game.
Thats funny because I remember an interview KISW had with Ray Manzarek (a man never without words)from the Doors in the 80's and they asked him what he thought of bands now(this being the 80's) and the whole MTV culture. He said that it was all hype and no substance. Bands think they have to get up there and learn choreography as well as playing the music, It must mean only one thing, it's for show. HERE WE ARE NOW, ENTERTAIN US.
To quote Trump " How very shallow" we have become. Even the quality of the sound(mp3, etc.) have gone to the side. But that's a different topic. I try to raise my daughter in knowing that Classical is still the alphabet of music and that a mark of a TALENTED musician, no matter the genre, will embrace that fact. Thus producing a distinct sound quality fitting and enhancing their talent.
MTV sold out that niche years ago.
Ditto for me. When MTV first came on (1981?) it was always our primary channel - we would occasionally watch other channels for news. I still watch VH1 classic when they have 80's music videos on. When rap and the other BS became the primary focus in the mid 90's, we were gone. Haven't watched MTV since.
Rap may be a legitimate form of expression, but it's not music. Talking is not music and a turntable is not a musical instrument.
Beat poetry in the 1950's was a legitimate form of expression, but it wasn't music either. Disco sucked, but it was music. Polka music sucks, but it's music.
There are lot's of musical genres besides rap that I can't stand including "smooth jazz" and anything by current, former, or wannabe "boy band" members, or the current group of pop tarts, but it is still music.
a turntable is not a musical instrument.
A turntable takes existing music and modifies it. Are you saying the beats behind Dangermouse's Grey Album (that is, snippets of Beatles songs) were not music?
Mixing is taking existing sounds (which are sometimes samples of previous songs) and making something new out of it... I believe that's what every other instrument does too.
Speaking of Danger Mouse which one of you is going to review the new Gnarls Barclay, The Odd Couple? Terry Gross interviewed them on NPR's Fresh Air on Friday and what they played sounded pretty good, very retro R&B/Soul.
#29.2 - Mon Jun 2, 2008 3:21 PM EDT
Infohack
Speaking of Danger Mouse which one of you is going to review the new Gnarls Barclay, The Odd Couple? Terry Gross interviewed them on NPR's Fresh Air on Friday and what they played sounded pretty good, very retro R&B/Soul.
I heard that. It was a fascinating interview. I loved their first album but haven't bought and heard their second yet.
A couple years ago I worked with a black mentally retarded special needs adult who refused to listen to anything but rap. He especially liked the really violent gangsta rap and no matter what you think about whether music affects emotions or vice versa there's gotta be something bad about someone who is adhd with explosive anger disorder and a history of violence listening on repeat to singers talking about killing people.
I'd buy stuff like Gnarls Barkley and would put that in rotation so I wouldn't go crazy - or watch him go beat up the walls - all the time.
His rationale for dropping the n bomb all the time - including against me (yes, i'm white and yes i told him a better insult would be honkey or white boy) was that his family and his favorite rappers say it so why can't he?
I told him I was from so. cal and had been to compton and so he decided I had street cred. As if.
a turntable is not a musical instrument.
The Berklee School of Music in Boston offers a degree for turntabalists. Since a conservatory offers lessons on the turntable, it is safe to call it an instrument.
A couple years ago I worked with a black mentally retarded special needs adult who refused to listen to anything but rap. He especially liked the really violent gangsta rap and no matter what you think about whether music affects emotions or vice versa there's gotta be something bad about someone who is adhd with explosive anger disorder and a history of violence listening on repeat to singers talking about killing people.
Scott, if you want to turn him on to some more progressive hip-hop music, I reccomend you hook him up with Brother Ali's second album Shadows on the Sun, Semi.Official's The Anti-Album, and I Self Devine's Self Destruction. He might like the aggressive beat production and in-your-face rhyme styles, but the lyrical content is far more elevated. Also try work buy Guilty Simpson and if all else fails, some Jedi Mind Tricks.
id also recommend
the streets from the uk.
I don't work with him anymore - and I no longer have to fear the day when I'd get my butt kicked and have to call the cops on him - but I appreciate the recommendations and may check out some of those.
Two other I tried to get him into were India Arie and Lauryn Hill but they didn't take.
I'll never forget how many times he played the Kris Kross album and he even tried wearing his pants backwards like they did. This was only about three years ago and I tried to explain how their time had passed long ago but he didn't care.
You darn kids get off my lawn!!!
That about sums up the sentiment I'm gathering from these comments.... not that there is anything wrong with that. I'm in my mid-30's and fondly remember the heyday of MTV. While I wasn't there to see "Video Killed the Radio Star" in 1981.. We did get cable in 1984 when I was still in grade school... with an almost otherwordly lineup of 35 channels. Much like today, the majority of these channels were junk... but MTV stood out. It was fresh and something all together new. Of course, that was almost 25 years ago... and let's face it, the music video format itself was always more novelty than substance.
By the late 80s/early 90s the novelty was pretty much used up... I was no longer tuning into MTV because of the videos... but more for the music. More to hear what was coming out from my favorite bands or to watch interviews from those same bands. The fact that pictures were playing along with the songs had become secondary... the excitement was gone. That was not the case in 1984... when you'd gladly sit through an awful song from Kajagoogoo or Rockwell just to watch the video unfold.
By the early 90's... I was still in the core MTV demographic... but couldn't have cared less about the videos themselves. Sure, something cool like "Sober" from Tool or even something perposterously overblown like "November Rain" from GNR showed that the video could still rise to something larger than the song itself... but for the most part, music videos just weren't exciting enough anymore to warrant dedicated watching when I could just as easily listen to a CD or the radio while doing other things..
I helped kill the MTV that we all fondly remember today... and while it's always fun to throw on the rose colored glasses and wax poetic... The music video format just wasn't ever going to be self-sustaining over the long haul.
29.3
I helped kill the MTV that we all fondly remember today... and while it's always fun to throw on the rose colored glasses and wax poetic... The music video format just wasn't ever going to be self-sustaining over the long haul
Ah, you're the jerk!:
kymlee,
I agree with you. I don't think that the music video itself is obsolete... as proven by videos from both mainstream and underground artists being distributed all over the internet.... But yea... just the idea of a dedicated channel that would play them 24/7... ala the early days of MTV... was probably always doomed to losing it's edge once the novelty wore off.
Geez, this whole article and my responses to it have made me realize that I am officially an old fogey. I remember thinking what vapid jackasses the first couple casts of "The Real World" were back in the early 90s. Now I haven't regularly watched a Real World since Puck stuck his dick in Pedro's peanut butter or whatever that was all about... But just from catching snippets during channel surfing, the recent casts make the original ones look like a bunch of goody goodies.
Re: MTV. What I most miss Is 120 Minutes and Alternative Nation because they played the songs and videos I really liked.
Also I LOVED Siffl and Olly.
Also in high school, being a bit of a loner, New Year's Eve parties consisted of me, two friends and watching MTV's New Year's Eve party
Also I LOVED Siffl and Olly.
Crescent Fresh!
That show was so great. Hmm, now that I think of it my ex-girlfriend bought me a dvd of some shows (because I'd gotten her into it too) then "borrowed it" and that was 3 years ago!
That show was way ahead of its time.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |